图片ai换脸 av
期刊简介
图片
《海外政事经济学驳斥》(Review of International Political Economy)是一份涵盖海外政事经济学考虑的双月刊同业评审学术期刊。其树立于1999年，由Routledge出书。本刊是海外政事经济学限制的主流期刊之一，与《新政事经济学》(New Political Economy)并排。2022年该刊影响因子为4.3。
本期目次
01
社会环境打破与地盘责罚：中国在阿根廷基础法子投资考虑
Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina
02
“非认真”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制搀和性
Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state
03
主权危急金融中的海外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的相比
International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures
04
核不扩散轨制复合体系的不相识性
The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex
05
责罚收罗空间：跨组织的策略规模的政事
Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations
06
竞争与轨制的复杂架构：海外栽植中的巨擘关系与分化
Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education
07
海外轨制复合体的品级与分化：相比考虑的表面框架ai换脸 av
Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research
08
海外轨制复合体中的价值分化、策略变化与合作
Value differentiation， policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes
本期纲要
社会环境打破与地盘责罚：中国在阿根廷基础拓荒投资考虑
题目：Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina
作家：Sol Mora，圣马丁国立大学政事与政府学院阿根廷国度科学时期考虑委员会 (CONICET) 的博士后考虑员。
纲要：本文通过分析地盘责罚——特地是通过中国基础法子投资在阿根廷试图实施的地盘取得，在新葛兰西宗旨方法和拉丁好意思洲政事生态学之间建立了对话。在这两种不雅点之间架起桥梁，将罗伯特·考克斯的框架应用于地盘责罚固有的社会和环境打破的考虑。对阿根廷的两个地盘取得贪图的考虑，其中一个被暂停，一个修改后赓续进行，标明社会箝制不错制约通过投资过火实行进行地盘限度的尝试。因此，这两种表面不雅点之间的对话不仅使考克斯的想想原意活力，而且将环境和当然责罚流程中的社会环境打破行为IPE的新考虑标的。
This article establishes a dialogue between the neo-Gramscian approach and Latin American Political Ecology by analyzing land governance – specifically attempts at land grabbing through Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina. Building bridges between these two perspectives enables an application of Robert Cox’s framework to the study of socio-environmental conflicts inherent to land governance. The study of two land grabbing initiatives in Argentina， one that was suspended and one that continues with modifications， shows that social resistance can condition attempts at land control through investments and their execution. Consequently， the dialogue between these two theoretical perspectives not only revitalizes Cox’s thought but also highlights socio-environmental conflicts in environmental and nature governance processes as a new research direction for IPE.
“非认真”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制搀和性
题目：Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state
作家：Danish Khan，好意思国富兰克林与马歇尔学院经济系助理讲授兼“不对等、禁闭、权利和社会正义倡议”勾通主任。
纲要：连年来，海外政事经济学（IPE）学者越来越珍爱城市问题。但是，他们主要珍爱的是特定的少数几个全球“城市”在转换成本、商品和处事的全球流动中的变装。尽管如斯，IPE文件中存在一个艰难的空缺在于对新目田宗旨全球化进度何如影响和要领位于全球南边城市的低收入“非认真”住房部门的探索有限。为了弥补现存IPE文件中的这一空缺，本文在新目田宗旨蕴蓄轨制的配景下，对非正规住房假寓点的酿成和吊销流程进行了批判性分析。非正规住房假寓点仍是得到了批判性地地舆学家和城市考虑限制学者的无为考虑。本文一鸣惊人之处在于对IPE文件方面作念出了独到的孝顺，即诈欺非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学行为批判性分析社会实质论和后殖民国度内在矛盾的切入点。本文觉得，通过“轨制搀和性”的视角不错更好地意会非正规住房假寓点与后殖民国度之间的关系。这个主见指的是后殖民国度内矛盾的社会经济和轨制刺激的会通，旨在同期经管社会再出产和成本宗旨蕴蓄。社会再出产和蕴蓄之间固有的张力在非正规住房假寓点中以“仁慈-暴力”的辩证法模式发扬出来。一方面，后殖民国度试图通过多脉络的权利收罗“允许”边际化群体建立非正规住房假寓点，以发扬出“仁慈”的形象。另一方面，一朝边际化群体辞让了房地产主导的成本宗旨蕴蓄，后殖民国度将经受暴力妙技闭幕他们。因此，本文觉得，IPE学者应仔细琢磨非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学，因为它提供了关系后殖民国度何如受到调控并被不同的新目田宗旨全球化社会经济力量拉扯的机制的深化观点。
In recent years， International Political Economy (IPE) scholars have increasingly turned their attention to cities. However， their primary focus has been on the role of a select few global 'cities’ that regulate global flows of capital， goods， and services. Nonetheless， a significant gap in the IPE literature pertains to the limited exploration of how processes of neoliberal globalization are impacting and regulating the low-income 'informal’ housing sector in cities located in the global South. To address this gap in the existing IPE literature， this paper critically analyzes the processes of formation and demolition of informal housing settlements against the backdrop of the neoliberal regime of accumulation. Informal housing settlements have been extensively examined by critical geographers and scholars in the field of urban studies. What distinguishes this paper is its unique contribution to the literature on IPE， that is， it utilizes the political economy of informal housing settlements as an entry point to critically analyze social ontology and the inherent contradictions of the postcolonial state. The paper argues that the relationship between informal housing settlements and the postcolonial state can be better understood through the lens of the 'institutional hybridity.’ This concept refers to the fusion of contradictory socio-economic and institutional impulses within the postcolonial state， which aims to manage social reproduction and capitalist accumulation simultaneously. The inherent tension between social reproduction and accumulation manifests in the informal housing settlements in the form of a dialectic of 'benevolence-violence.’ On one hand， the postcolonial state attempts to appear 'benevolent’ towards marginalized groups by 'allowing’ them to establish informal housing settlements through a multi-layered network of clientelism. On the other hand， the postcolonial state resorts to violent displacement of marginalized groups as soon as they pose obstacles to real estate-led capitalist accumulation. Thus， the paper contends that IPE scholars should carefully consider the political economy of informal housing settlements， as it provides captivating insights into the mechanisms through which the postcolonial state becomes subject to regulation and is pulled in different directions by the socio-economic forces of neoliberal globalization.主权危急金融中的海外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的相比
题目：International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures
作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学海外处事学院海外经济关系讲授。
纲要：海外轨制复杂性表面框定了海外合作的预期，这种预期源自不同机构体系中品级和互异化组合。本文相比了2000年至2019年时期，东亚、拉丁好意思洲和欧元区危急金融区域复杂体系中地区金融安排与海外货币基金组织之间的关系，并对熟悉了这些预期。行为全球和地区机构之间的杂乱国度，债权国在选定这些复杂体系的架构（品级和互异化的组合）方面尤其具有影响力，但受到前几十年所接管的安排的为止。一朝选定了复杂体系的架构，它反过来将影响借债国的策略养息和国度在不惬意机构时是追求轨制漂浮如故建立竞争性轨制。这些发现总体上稳健预期，但超出了核式样论对欧元区策略养息的预期程度。机构间的配合动态填补了这一解释差距。本文的论断是，机构之间的关系关于意会轨制复杂体系的收尾和演变至关艰难，况兼比单一轨制宗旨、权利差距假说和其他替代方法提供的解释更齐全。
The theory of international regime complexity that frames this study specifies expectations for international cooperation stemming from different combinations of hierarchy and differentiation among institutions in regime complexes. This paper compares relationships between regional financial arrangements and the International Monetary Fund in the regional complexes for crisis finance in East Asia， Latin America， and the euro area during 2000-2019 and tests these expectations. Creditor states that sit at the nexus between global and regional institutions are particularly influential in the choice of architecture (the combination of hierarchy and differentiation) for these complexes but are constrained by arrangements inherited from previous decades. Once chosen， the complex’s architecture in turn shapes policy adjustment in borrowing countries and influences whether states pursue regime shifting or competitive regime creation when dissatisfied with institutions. These findings generally coincide with expectations， but exceed the degree of policy adjustment that the core theory expected for the euro area. Interinstitutional collaboration， the dynamics of which are elaborated， fills this explanatory gap. The paper concludes that relations among institutions are essential for understanding the outcomes and evolution of regime complexes and underpin a more complete explanation than provided by singular institutionalism， the power-gap hypothesis and other alternative approaches.
核不扩散轨制复合体系的不相识性
题目：The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex
作家：Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni，剑桥大学政事与海外考虑系海外组织和全球政事学讲授
纲要：本文对核不扩散轨制复合体系的轨制架构中旅途依赖性的变化进行了表面分析，并分析了不同轨制复合结构对机构竞争和策略养息的影响。最先，我建议了一个一般性表面，论述了海外轨制复合体系（IRCs）的先有的轨制结构何如以一种使IRC易于内生旅途依赖性变化的方式促进和为止随后的轨制发展。接下来，我论述了在核不扩散复合体系中，轨制漂浮和竞争性轨制建立策略何如激发了旅途依赖性的“反映序列”，导致轨制分裂日益加重。为了诠释IRC演变的内生能源，我在三个“要津时刻”疑望了核不扩散复合体系：20世纪70年代中期、冷战杀青时期和21世纪初。在每个时期，外生的扩散冲击与现存的机构结构互相作用，产生了特定的竞争模式，从而激发了日益加重的轨制分裂的反映序列。我的论点关于全球经济责罚具有无为的适用性，并对不竭增长的海外政事经济学文件探讨全球责罚机构中的反映序列和轨制退让具有艰难真谛。
This article theorizes path-dependent changes in the institutional architecture of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex; it analyses the effects of different regime-complex structures on institutional contestation and policy adjustment. I first offer a general theory of how the preexisting institutional structures of international regime complexes (IRCs) facilitate and constrain subsequent institutional developments in ways that make IRCs prone to endogenous， path-dependent change. Next， I illustrate how strategies of regime shifting and rival regime creation in the nuclear nonproliferation complex have triggered path-dependent 'reactive sequencing’， resulting in growing institutional fragmentation. To illustrate endogenous dynamics of IRC evolution， I examine the nuclear nonproliferation complex at three 'critical junctures’: The mid-1970s， the end of the Cold War， and the early-2000s. During each period， exogenous proliferation shocks interacted with pre-existing institutional structures to produce specific patterns of contestation which set in motion a reactive sequence of growing institutional fragmentation. My argument has relevance for global economic governance broadly and for the growing IPE literature which explores reactive sequencing and institutional decay in global governance institutions.
责罚收罗空间：跨组织的策略规模的政事
题目：Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations
作家：Stephanie C. Hofmann，欧洲大学考虑所政事与社会科学系讲授和罗伯特·舒曼高档考虑中心海外关紧缚合主席；Patryk Pawlak，卡内基欧洲考虑中心的探望学者和欧洲大学考虑所（佛罗伦萨）罗伯特·舒曼高档考虑中心兼职讲授。
纲要：策略规模和问题互相依存并非是既定的。它们所触及的蛮横关系——由谁责罚、何如责罚以及策略限制在那边——跟着时期的推移被轨制化，这平时是由全球朔方国度最先制定。咱们对这些蛮横关系如安在组织里面和跨组织轨制化的方式知之甚少。为此，咱们通过探究一个新兴策略限制如安在一个高度轨制化的环境中，何如和取得什么效率来填补这个空缺。咱们觉得，新策略限制，如收罗空间或东说念主工智能，促使政府转机资源通过将远景性的问题团员在新组织和现存组织中进行择地选定策略框架，以拓荒定约合作。当先，志同说念合的国度在组织中更有可能产生共识，从而导致部分互异化的非品级轨制复合体。弥远而言，竞争性的压力养息，尤其南半球国度所感受到的压力，有助于激发轨制向一个和谐的一般性组织的轨制转换。要津的活动者必须重新养息他们的框架，从而减少互异。在当前的地缘政事寰球中，这加重了组织里面政事不合。咱们在收罗空间的案例中熟悉了三个命题，并展示了跨组织竞争框架的扩散何如导致策略辩白漂浮到勾通国，而在勾通国只可进行碎裂的策略养息。咱们的分析基于一手贵府和千里浸式策略。
Policy boundaries and issue interdependence are not a given. The stakes they imply—who governs， how， and where a policy domain is—become institutionalized over time， often first by the Global North. We know little about how these stakes are presented and institutionalized within and across organizations. We tackle this lacuna by asking how， and to what effect， an emerging policy domain is situated in a densely institutionalized environment. We argue that new policy domains such as cyberspace or artificial intelligence prompt resourceful governments to forum-shop policy frames by clustering promising issues in new and existing organizations in pursuit of coalition-building. Initially， resonance is more likely to be established in organizations with like-minded countries， leading to partially differentiated non-hierarchical regime complexes. In the long-term， competing adjustment pressures， particularly felt in the Global South， help trigger a regime-shift to an orchestrating general-purpose organization. Key actors must reconfigure their frames thereby reducing differentiation. In today’s geopolitical world， this hardens intra-organizational political differences. We examine three propositions in the case of cyberspace and show how the proliferation of competing frames across organizations led to shifting the policy debate to the UN， where only piecemeal policy adjustments are possible. Our analysis is based on primary sources and immersion strategies.
与轨制的复杂架构：海外栽植中的巨擘关系与分化
题目：Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education
作家：Rie Kijima，多伦多大学蒙克全球事务与大师策略学院的助理讲授；Phillip Y. Lipscy，多伦多大学政事学系和蒙克全球事务与大师策略学院讲授，及东京大学法学院讲授。
纲要：轨制复杂性的决定身分和后果是什么？咱们觉得，海外议题限制的特征——收罗效应和插足壁垒——影响了可行竞争的程度，并对巨擘关系、轨制互异化和实质性收尾产生了艰难影响。竞争倾向于侵蚀现存轨制的主导地位，缩小品级轨制。竞争下的互异化因权利和物资资源而异：强大的国度试图通过引入无互异化的机构来更正近况，而资源有限的活动者则倾向于针对互异化的利基商场。实质性收尾的互异取决于启动的轨制竖立，特地是在当先被赋予权利的活动者更可能从竞争中失利。咱们通过考虑海外栽植轨制复杂体系（这是一个具有极其艰难性但时时被淡薄的议题限制）来发展这个表面并测试四个假定。
What are the determinants and consequences of regime complexity? We argue that characteristics of international issue areas – network effects and entry barriers – affect the degree of feasible competition， with important consequences for authority relations， institutional differentiation， and substantive outcomes. Competition tends to erode the dominance of status quo institutions， diminishing hierarchy. Differentiation under competition varies according to power and material resources: Powerful states seek to shift the status quo by introducing undifferentiated institutions， while actors with limited resources tend to target differentiated niches. Variation in substantive outcomes depends on the initial configuration of institutions， particularly which actors are originally empowered and thus stand to lose from competition. We develop this theory and test four hypotheses by examining the regime complex for international education， a substantively important but often neglected issue area.
海外轨制复合体的品级与分化：相比考虑的表面框架
题目：Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research
作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学海外处事学院海外经济关系讲授；Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理讲授。
纲要：海外轨制复杂性的主见提供了一个有效的视角来考虑全球责罚中海外机构的不竭增多。越来越多的海外政事经济学（IPE）文件指出，好多艰难策略限制存在重复的机构集群，但是一些学者觉得，复杂性缩小了责罚服从，而另一些学者则觉得漫衍的机构优于兼并的机构。为了使这些发现具有连贯性，咱们建议了一个一般的表面框架，基于两个结构特征来形容轨制复杂性：巨擘关系和机构分化。这些维度共同决定了国度和其他活动者在受命轨制规则时所濒临的机遇和为止。因此，它们塑造了艰难的收尾，举例策略养息、轨制漂浮和创建竞争性轨制。本文建议了关系巨擘和分化效应的可熟悉假定，并评估它们与本专题的五篇同伴著作所考虑的八个轨制复杂体的对应关系。咱们进一步笃定了一组塑造轨制复杂体随时期演变的动态流程。咱们的框架加强了轨制复杂体的相比分析基础，并为考虑贪图提供了新的议程。
The concept of international regime complexity offers a useful lens for examining the increasing density of international institutions in global governance. A growing literature in International Political Economy (IPE) identifies clusters of overlapping institutions in many important policy areas， yet some scholars argue that complexity undermines governance effectiveness， while others perceive distinct advantages over unified institutions. To bring coherence to these findings， we present a general theoretical framework that characterizes regime complexes based on two structural features: Authority relations and institutional differentiation. These dimensions jointly determine the opportunities and constraints that states and other actors confront as they navigate institutional rules. As a result， they shape important outcomes， such as policy adjustment， regime shifting and competitive regime creation. The article proposes testable hypotheses regarding the effects of authority and differentiation， and we assess their correspondence with the eight regime complexes examined by the five companion articles in this special issue. We further identify a set of dynamic processes that shape the evolution of regime complexes over time. Our framework strengthens the foundation for comparative analysis of regime complexes and charts a new agenda for the research program.
海外轨制复合体中的价值分化、策略变化与合作
题目：Value differentiation， policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes
作家：Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理讲授。
纲要：在海外政事经济学(IPE)的好多议题限制中，国度间的合作受到密集的、不同但重复的海外机构收罗的经管。这种“轨制复杂性”环境是增强如故缩小合作一直备受争议。有东说念主觉得，重复的机构增强了正当性和天真性，而其他东说念主则觉得，契机宗旨的择地选定使得国度大致走避盲从严格的规则。本文结伙了这个争论，解释轨制复杂性会根据轨制之间的价值互异程度产生不同的影响。在那些不具互异化机构行为替代品的议题限制中，择地选定会裁汰轨制不断国度步履的才调。但是，在那些轨制机构通过价值差异的问题限制中，即即跟着规则变得愈加严格，它们提供的刚正也会增多，机构重复不错促使国度策略变革。本文论述了这一动态变化，并在对选举不雅察和与丛林关系的碳赔偿的政权复合体进行相比分析时提供了警戒笔据。
偷拍走光In many issue areas in international political economy (IPE)， interstate cooperation is governed by a dense network of distinct but overlapping international institutions. Whether this environment of 'regime complexity’ strengthens or undermines cooperation is a subject of intense debate. Some argue that overlapping institutions enhance legitimacy and flexibility， while others claim that opportunistic forum shopping enables states to escape compliance with rigorous rules. This article reconciles this debate， demonstrating that regime complexity has contrasting effects depending on the degree of value differentiation among institutions. In issue areas where undifferentiated institutions function as substitutes， forum shopping will reduce the regime’s ability to discipline state behavior. However， in issue areas where institutions are differentiated by value – i.e. the benefits they provide increase as rules become more rigorous – institutional overlap can increase policy change among states. I demonstrate these dynamics formally and provide empirical evidence in a comparative analysis of the regime complexes for election observation and forest-related carbon offsets.
编译 | 朱嘉成 崔育涞
校对 | 崔育涞 朱嘉成
排版 | 赵弘宇
本文源于《海外政事经济学驳斥》，本文为公益共享，处事于科研教训，不代表本平台不雅点。如有物化，接待指正。
图片
本站仅提供存储处事，统统内容均由用户发布，如发现存害或侵权内容，请点击举报。